Review Essentials
1. Clarity
1. The thesis can clearly describe the goal or purpose of the research.
2. On first reading, it becomes clear what the paper says.
3. The problem statement is clear.
4. Papers that violate ethics, laws or related conflicts of interest should not be published.
2. Originality and Importance
1. The paper has its novelty and value.
2. The paper has an “empirical” contribution.
3. Topics cover relevant international literature.
4. Citing recent and recent literature.
5. Discuss the importance of furniture.
6. The paper can arouse the interest of the readers.
7. In the thesis, there are some things you expected to know but not presented in the article.
3. Applicability and universality
1. The paper is in line with the purpose and goal of this journal.
2. The background / content of the research is clear.
3. The title of the thesis is consistent with the content.
4. The abstract covers the full text. The Chinese and English abstracts are consistent.
5. Key words are appropriate. Chinese and English keywords are the same.
6. The format of the thesis is universal and easy to read.
7. The written discussion is fluent and smooth. Wording is precise and free of typos.
8. The paper structure is logical and systematic.
9. Figures and tables are appropriate (including sequence, symbols, measurement units, etc.).
10. The paper can be more concise without affecting the original meaning.
4. Evidence
1. The research has a theoretical, scientific, or policy basis.
2. Clearly state the relevant research evidence cited.
3. Reasonably state the findings and conclusions of the research.
4. Relevant to nursing or health care and of practical value.
5. The conclusion is appropriate and can echo the key points of this article.
5. Research rigor
1. The research method is appropriate.
2. The research design is clearly described.
3. The source of the research object is clearly described.
4. Samples and sampling methods are appropriate.
5. Reliability and validity / rigority of data collection.
6. Data analysis method is appropriate.
7. The discussion echoes the research findings.
8. Clearly state the study limitations.
9. Ethical considerations are stated.